“The deadliest poisons don’t kill you fast. They keep you alive just long enough to call the sickness normal.” -- Mark Twain

 

I hate to ask, but we are still needing your help. Thanks in advance!

 

AdSupply

Bidgear ad

 

stories

Posted by Tyler Durden, Authored by Chris Summers via The Epoch Times,

NATO military activity in the Arctic poses a direct threat to Russia's security and could lead to disastrous consequences, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov wrote in an article published by the Russian Foreign Ministry on Monday..

In February, NATO conducted Arctic Sentry, a large-scale military exercise in the Arctic and High North regions, amid concerns over the threat posed by both Russia and China. Russia, which has a naval fleet in the Arctic that includes nuclear-armed submarines dating back to the Soviet era, has long viewed the region as its sphere of interest.

"Intensive military preparations are underway in close proximity to our northern borders," Lavrov said. "NATO is conducting large-scale military exercises involving non-regional countries and introducing new components of its command-and-control system."

He said such activity increases the "risk of incidents that could trigger an armed confrontation with potentially disastrous consequences."

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said in February that Arctic Sentry was launched as a result of "Russia's increased military activity, and China's growing interest in the High North."

Lavrov said the West was also attempting to undermine Russia's international cooperation in the Arctic with countries from the "Global Majority," a term the Kremlin often uses to describe African and Asian countries.

Last month, at the NATO summit in Turkey, U.S. President Donald Trump again pressed for the United States to take control of Greenland, which he said has become a national security concern because of increasing Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic.

'Landmark' Shipping Voyage

Moscow is keen on developing the Northern Sea Route, an Arctic shipping corridor that creates a shortcut between Europe and Northeast Asian markets, including China, South Korea and Japan. It could cut the time for a container ship by 10 days compared with the regular route via the Indian Ocean and the Suez Canal, according to the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.

In his article, Lavrov said a "landmark event" in Arctic shipping occurred on Aug. 19.

"For the first time, a container ship from China arrived at the port of Murmansk via the Northern Sea Route, a vital part of the Trans-Arctic Transport Corridor," he said.

The Barents Observer reported that the vessel was the Xin Xin Hai-1, a cargo ship that sails under a Hong Kong flag.

Lavrov said the Arctic contributed at least 10 percent of Russia's GDP and was home to more than 2.5 million Russian citizens.

Claire's Observations:  There is only so far NATO can "push" for regional dominance here, before Russia will think it has no other choice, but to respond militarily; that day may well be a lot closer than many Western observers, particularly those in national intelligence capacities, may care to believe.

So then the question becomes, what happens next?!  A war between NATO and Russia, or NATO, Europe, China, and Russia over this territory?!?

The US cannot seem to get a reasonable" foothold" militarily against Iran, after 6 months of fighting; so what chance does it have, even in concert with NATO, of "besting" Russia and/or China militarily in the Arctic?!?  

I'm not sure, and would never present myself as any military tactician.

That being said, that chance of doing this successfully, rests on well, intelligently planned logistics; excellent training of the troops involved; and a consistent, coherent command structure, capable of anticipating, then immediately responding to any changes on the ground in the war theatre.

This morning upon awakening, I saw the following news items:  https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16094775/Army-secretary-takedown-Pete-Hegseth-Trump.html;  https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16094317/Army-chief-QUITS-clashes-Pete-Hegseth.html

I would like to politely suggest, that with the US military going through "....a great deal of transition with which to deal currently", that now may NOT be the time for the US and NATO to even be THINKING about pushing Russia in the Arctic; at least not until the proverbial "dust settles" from this very public resignation by Driscoll, and the assigning of whoever will be needed to replace him.  

And to Secretary of War Hegseth, a word, please; never hire someone who fervently believes... that their primary job is to protect you from the truth, no matter how unpalatable that truth might be.