Thought for the day

"No one ever is selected by the puppet master to be the POTUS unless they agree to carry out an essential piece of the agenda.  Once they sign the contract to become President of the U.S. Corporation, they work for the Federal Reserve not the American People.  So, it's the foreign owners of the FED who always choose the POTUS.  However, that does not mean a POTUS, once installed in the Oval Office, cannot go rogue.  JFK did just that.  So did DJT." -- Intelligence Analyst & Former U.S Military Officer

Adsupply

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”  ~ George Orwell, 1984, Book 1, Chapter 7

Perhaps the most helpful format for communication: 

My best “shot” to explain, document, and prove the “Covid” + “vaccine” narrative are Crimes Against Humanity: a 4,700-word essay I sent to ~100 teacher colleagues in September, 2021 (received with silence to the facts, with ~20 eventual responses to be removed from such communications). My May 2022 essay to our teachers’ union Board is an excellent overview of the entire history, with emerging data demonstrating tremendous harm from these experimental injections (2-hour overview discussion with Professor Emeritus Jim Fetzer).

 

Summary (links = full documentation in those specific reports): The California “lockdown orders” necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases” (and herehere) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic,” that hospitals have comprehensive area plans for record flu seasons they haven’t needed, and certainly didn’t need the military field hospitals or hospital ships for a real pandemic.

 

As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020 I questioned our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limit to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions within their limited governing authorities. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81). 

 

From September 2020 until May 1, 2022, I chose to mask identities of individuals involved to help shield them from any possible future harm when facts emerge to demonstrate to the public that these school administrators and teachers were either knowing participants, or dupes too weak in intellectual integrity and moral courage to recognize and defend literal Truth, Justice, and the American way of limited government under constitutionally-protected inalienable/Natural rights.  I named names after 20 months of district lies and prima facie crimes.

 

After two Sept. 2020 requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and stating HUSD employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” (disobedient staff are placed on unpaid leave up to a year). I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in US History class that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.

 

After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety by issuing apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).

 

Our union (HEA) responded with support to ask the district, and communicated privately they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because working conditions were negotiated in good faith with high approval of union members. After I probed with a few questions, I retreated with HEA to keep them as allies with me to get answers from our contractual grievance process. That said, this first Grievance finished with district and union agreement that the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance because all district policies were in conformance to law. Neither the district nor union ever addressed my question or citation about limits of dictatorial ordering authority.

 

I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment. 

 

I received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded by a phone call response in December, their promise to follow-up, and silence since.

 

In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions: 

  • How many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid? 
  • What is the current and historical data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths? 
  • How many staff and students have been injured by vaccines?

The superintendent ignored my emailed questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.

 

Our district superintendent then "answered" my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings. 

 

I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority. The only answer I received referencing limits to dictatorial orders was from CA Senator Glazer’s office, who offered that a stated 60-day limit I questioned applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as happened with Governor Newsom, albeit with Dominion “voting” machines, but that’s another history) or electing other legislators.

 

Therefore, at this point in our history, school district, teachers’ union, and CA government “answers” are at this point demonstrated as intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever dictatorial power until legislators or governor dictate otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.” This power is dictated with direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1) placed at the top of every county “health” “order.”

 

At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district never responded to my repeated requests and Grievance to cite anything I wrote to substantiate their complaints. The district has never rescinded their first of four steps for employment termination. 

 

Stop and appreciate the irony of public school district leadership refusing to cite factual claims while requiring it of all middle school students. Again: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).

 

appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and herehere). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any,” followed by a Zoom meeting. Our union President raised the topic at her regular weekly meeting with the district’s Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district then emailed me claiming my PLC report “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet failed again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.

 

I responded with three employee grievances for apparent contract violations

 

On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district would again consider my Grievances as employee complaints outside their contractual obligations, and the HR Assistant Superintendent admitted failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.

 

On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for the 2021 - ‘22 school year to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first public question on the call for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court. This answer is consistent with my observations that people are conditioned to be told what to do by “experts’” “orders.” 

 

The purpose of our mutual Oath is to safeguard inalienable/Natural rights against illegal “orders” from our own government. The United States rose as a nation because our own government issued “a long train of abuses and usurpations” in the form of illegal “orders.” Americans’ choices were to either surrender as colonial subjects under dictatorial rule benefiting Empire, or stand for what our mutual Oath “supports and defends.” Thomas Jefferson documented: 

 

“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”  ~ Declaration of Independence

 

My school district’s final answer to my three employee grievances came on July 21, 2021: 

  1. Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered. 
  2. “Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. The district will not respond to requests for documentation of “ordering” authority, nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
  3. If teachers ask further questions how “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”

On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to employment termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me or withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders. 

 

I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. A second conversation affirmed the strength of this case from its abundant documentation, and that the network of lawyers are filing lawsuits based on their judgment of the best cases to help the most amount of people in greatest need of protection. I promised my willingness to serve as a plaintiff if this case rises in their judgment as the most promising to litigate. I’ve been updating three law firms participating in lawsuits that have included Los Angeles USD, San Diego USD, and nearby Piedmont USD. The attorneys communicate appreciation of my professionalism, that they would enjoy representing this case, and continue to encourage my documented work for truth and justice under the law.

 

On September 4, 2021, I reported to my ~100 teacher colleagues my best “shot” to “red pill” them about dozens of game-changing facts corporate media never report (my published research on corporate media “reporting” lies known to be false as they were told for the many variants of the Wars on Terror). This report to teachers (at “Update 3”) is my best academic work as a scholar to publicly share comprehensive and game-changing facts to explain, document, and prove illegal “health” “orders” (and here).

 

On Friday September 17, our district superintendent announced the school board would address mandatory student “vaccines” on Wednesday, September 22. I responded to district and teachers’ union leadership with legal notice of their prima facie-crimes to “require” experimental medical products, and initiated another employee Grievance for contract violation guaranteeing policies in conformance to law.

 

On Monday September 20, the district superintendent emailed my school’s Admin Team, teachers’ union president, and me to dictate the Professional Learning Committee I chair was censored because my addressing the previous school year’s doubled failure rate with “distance learning” (the most destructive decline of student learning in district history) “is not aligned with school or district goals and may not continue. Please communicate with (school principal) how you intend to use collaboration time or participate in a PLC that is focused on standards based instruction, school, or district goals.” Consistent with history, the superintendent failed to cite anything I wrote to demonstrate his factual claims.

 

On Wednesday September 22, the school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (again, please see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs of deserved quotation marks). The public comment session for 1-minute remarks were ~15 against and ~25 for. Four parents and two employees contacted me from my public comment including invitation to do so, which began our ongoing conversations and actions. My three employee Grievances (at that point) also gave our teachers’ union an ultimatum to honor our contract that all district policies be “in conformance with law” by standing with me against the district’s illegal “mandates” that violate US Codes 21 and 18, and California Government Code 8558 (b) that “emergency orders” authority requires “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case). CDC’s latest data seemed definitive proof that California and national hospitals are well within control, just as each and every one of the ~20 local doctors, nurses, and other professionals I’ve asked have told me since March 2020.

 

On October 2, I sent a second email to our teachers’ union President, VP, and district Board Members arguing for their legal and Oath-sworn obligation to stand with me to force the district to explain the legality of their “health” “orders” given the above crystal-clear in letter and intent legal limits (the district’s stated position is “we just follow orders, and so will you”).

 

On October 17, 2021 I sent another Professional Learning Committee (PLC) report to district and union leaderships + Boards, and ~100 teacher colleagues with two central topics. First: HUSD refuses to address limits to state/county/district “health orders” regarding required student and teacher use of Emergency Use Authorized medical products (EUAs), despite :

The second topic of the October 17 PLC report is that our teachers’ union shared their position why “health orders” to “require” EUAs is lawful: the government is not kidnapping and forcibly injecting teachers. Yes, seriously; that’s their “legal” “justification”: as long as the principal isn’t tackling teachers in the hallway to forcibly inject them at will, the policy of staff forced unpaid leave respects Title 21 freedom for full choice over medical experiments. I was glad to force an answer, and didn’t pursue further as I’d still rather keep the union as a partner to force reasonable district answers.

 

On October 21, 2021, our teachers’ union president emailed me to declare my employee grievance void that requested the district to either cite their legal authority for EUA work requirements given the limits of three definitive laws, or to downgrade “requirements for employment” to “advice.” The “reason” given was the union claims that the district doesn’t have to cite legal authority for policy because any proofs of illegal policies “do not concern violations of the CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement)” despite the CBA stating all district policies must be “in conformance with law.” Both HEA and HUSD claim that state dictatorial “orders” are sufficient legal authority to compel obedience, and both have never addressed our mutual STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE for We the People to serve as a check on exactly this problem of illegal dictatorial government orders. My three subsequent communications to union President, VP, and Board were unanswered.

 

On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my last employee Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I challenged that stand, as well as challenging district refusal to answer basic questions about “official” exemptions to EUAs.

 

On November 14, after a week of “official silence” from district and teachers’ union, I poked them again with questions, request to meet, and predictions of dire consequences to HUSD for their official silence beyond “just follow orders.” I also admonished HEA’s tragic-comic consent to CTA’s position that “option to refuse” experimental medical treatments allows employee termination without future ability of re-hire in public education. Both embrace Orwellian-violations of definitive CA and federal laws that “option to refuse” means the individual is free to accept or decline experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.” 

 

On November 15, our school principal sent an “URGENT” email “ordering” ~200 students to the quad: “All unvaccinated students will be sent home, all vaccinated student (sic) will return to class with a pass.” I discovered I was also “health ordered” home for 10 days, until I demanded documentation of definitions from the principal, and reminding him this ordering authority requires proof I was within 6 feet of a positive case for 15 minutes. After claiming no memory of the policy, the principal and I reviewed and proved “district error” (but 14 of my students were not provided this documentation for discovery of error, nor another teacher). Although my school principal admitted he lacked authority to “order” me into isolated segregation, he still obeyed district “orders” to segregate unvaxxed students. I immediately emailed the Assistant Superintendent of HR to explain and cite district ordering authority to segregate healthy unvaxxed students, which she has failed to provide over ~20 requests up to March 2022. This week also had our teachers’ union request to HUSD accepted for a December 1 “Level III” Grievance meeting with the superintendent to discuss district censorship of my PLC and taking the first step to terminate my employment due to district claims of complaints HUSD refuse to cite. HUSD continued their 6th week of failure to provide me legal definitions of the medical/religious exemption process, but agreed to meet for discussion on Dec. 3. Both of these meetings would be attended by our teachers’ union President and me. 

 

Ten students voiced interest in a “Truth Club,” and submitted paperwork to our Associated Student Body (ASB) with me as their club sponsor to address “the pandemic” and other game-changing areas of truth (hereherehere). On December 1 and 3 I had Zoom meetings with district leadership and our teachers’ union President regarding the previous paragraph topics. 

 

On December 3rd, my principal sent another “friendly reminder” for weekly Covid testing required for my continued employment. For the second time, he mistakenly revealed all email recipients who are not vaccinated. I responded with another “reply to all” to challenge my principal to explain how the “health orders” he signs are legal given federal Title 21 requirements for optional experimental medical products without coercion, or to join those of us asking questions about how these “orders” are anything other than Orwellian-illegal. The principal chose silence as his response.

 

For the week of December 6, I followed-up with our school principal’s silence to our questions, and my briefed classroom students requested a Zoom meeting with the district to receive answers. Students were especially motivated to receive an explanation how the district can violate “required” health “guidance” by “ordering” healthy unvaccinated students to “separate but equal” 10 days’ “medical segregation” without evidence of “exposure” to a “positive” “tested” student by being within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more. They understood I was allowed to stay on campus because HUSD has zero evidence of exposure within 6 feet for 15 minutes, but students are not allowed the same freedom for an equal education.

 

On Friday December 10, I received the district’s reply to our Dec. 3 meeting: the district claimed that their policy requiring employee use of EUAs or being put on unpaid leave was a “broader right” of Title 21’s right of full and fail choice to accept or decline EUAs without coercion. I responded in detail with request for another meeting for HUSD to explain their Orwellian-inversion of simple terms to claim “broader rights” include forced student segregation and forced employee unpaid leave.

 

On December 14, I invited the district to surrender if they wanted to avoid an upcoming meeting with ~50 students with pointed questions. HUSD announced the following day they wouldn’t enforce student “vaccine requirements.” Because of the district’s refusal to address my questions in their December 10 response, I escalated those questions into Employee Grievances and/or District Complaints. On Dec. 18, I updated ~100 teacher colleagues on breaking events.

 

Also on December 14, the district superintendent officially responded to placing my PLC on two months of censorship under threat of my employment termination if I continued reporting to teachers in “unprofessional conduct” they claimed since April, but repeatedly refused to cite from anything I wrote, said, or did. They withdrew the censorship under claim that the “initial” censorship was valid due to “district confusion” that my addressing a doubled student failure rate was not “focused on standards based instruction, and/or school goals, and/or district goals.” HUSD made this claim despite the PLC report in question stating in the first paragraph that the purpose of the report is to address our doubled student failure rate (btw: the reading level in the paragraph averaged at the 10th Grade level among 5 tests). HUSD claimed they needed “clarification,” and chose censorship rather than asking clarifying questions citing any concern. HUSD also chose silence over my two months of questioning to cite their concerns and alleged policy violations, including silence to two levels of my employee Grievance. My “clarification” was sufficient to remove district censorship, but not sufficient to remove district threat of my employment termination. 

 

After the Winter Break on January 4, 2022, our principal reported another claimed “positive” “case” of “Covid,” and “health” “ordered” 18 of my students into “separate but equal” medical segregation for 10 days of “isolated-public education.” Two students asked for my help to stand for their rights that HUSD has zero evidence they had “close contact” within 6 feet for 15 minutes to the “positive” student, as the district claimed was the rule for unvaxxed students. My question to the principal how this is legal was responded that my question was a “negative connotation” and refused to answer with promise of no further response (Update 1).

 

On Thursday Jan. 6 at 6:30 AM, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD and our teachers’ union of the facts, then one of the students and I met with the principal and assistant principal before school. The student, an 11th Grade female with spark and courage, further met with the AP after I left to teach classes, with the AP calling a school nurse then an assistant superintendent for help answering the question he couldn’t answer. Nobody had an answer of the district’s authority to QU-segregate students without proof of close contact. That assistant superintendent met the following morning with that student and a second segregated student (11th Grade male with quiet intelligence and strength). Both students reported that the Assistant Superintendent spent an hour trying to talk them out of their questions, claimed the district was acting “out of abundance of caution” (a talking point our principal also used). When the students insisted on answers, this assistant superintendent promised to call the county health department to ask “what to do about these two students.” Despite having no evidence of ordering authority, she maintained the district’s “health” “order” for their isolated segregation with the prima facie-illegal claim of “separate but equal” public education. 

 

The assistant superintendent reneged on her promise to respond no later than Monday Jan. 10 (Update 1), and ignored my three emails requesting she state who she spoke with at the county public health department, what documents were referenced, and what was discussed. Because the assistant superintendent chose silence to these reasonable requests to fulfill her promise to two of my students, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD, our teachers’ union, and our high school’s teachers on Jan. 11, and again on Jan. 12 upon no district response (minus ~12 teachers requesting exclusion). My sharing documentation of an Assistant Superintendent’s lies to two students provoked my school principal into ad hominem attack (Update 4); stating my support of two segregated healthy students were “attacks,” “trying to indoctrinate students into his way of thinking,” and “is by far the lowest I have ever seen any "educator" sink in my 16 years in the profession.” The principal defamed my professional questions on school policies as “lengthy diatribes” “I refuse to respond (to),” then gave instructions to all my teacher colleagues how to block all emails from me on any subject. I find it difficult to imagine a more unprofessional response from a school principal to a teacher’s reasonable and cited questions on district policy.

 

The week of Jan. 10 to 14 was distance learning via computer because the district sent home too many healthy unvaxxed staff to keep the schools open. HUSD would later that month only send home unvaxxed students “in the same indoor space” as a “positive” “test,” but not staff: another prima facie-illegal policy with motive to not close the school and no apparent “health” concern.

 

On January 12, I emailed to my broadest audience the documentation of the assistant superintendent ignoring my emails requesting a report how school segregation is legal that she promised my two students, given nobody at the district can explain. The only response we received from that assistant superintendent was to our first standing student who emailed the assistant superintendent requesting a report. Her “answer:” “I do not have an update on how to prove the distance before quarantining.” Please note that this non-answer does not fulfill her promise to report on what she discovered by calling the county public health department, and is similar to a student missing a promised and due report on public policy, and when asked about it after two days being late, the student answers, “I do not have an update.” 

 

This is a good time to mention that the California Teachers’ Association (CTA) ignored my second request for explanation how state and federal laws for optional experimental medical products can be violated by “health” “orders” (Oct. 20 and Dec. 30). I wonder why (Update 2). 

 

On Jan. 14, I emailed HUSD + HEA leaderships and our school’s willing teachers that two Assistant Superintendents have refused to document and explain how student segregation to isolated “separate but equal” public education is legal. I also withdrew my consent, in what I consider an excellent public essay. 

 

On Jan. 18, the district emailed to all staff and community members an “updated” policy to segregate unvaxxed students and staff if they were “in the same indoor space” as somebody “testing” “positive.” My response to district and union leaderships + boards included my promise for student and community complaints if I did not receive reasonable evidence authorizing “in the same indoor space.” HUSD chose silence as their response. By Friday I had 26 of my healthy unvaxxed students “health” “ordered” to isolated segregation from this “same indoor space” invented phrase, but HUSD chose not to enforce this on staff. HUSD “picking and choosing” some arbitrary “health orders” to enforce and not other arbitrary “health orders” proves a hidden political agenda (political=policy=“what is done”) to manipulate our school community, and certainly not a commitment to “health.”

 

On January 17, I reported to my broadest HUSD email audience that the district’s “requirement” for masks outdoors is also apparently a contrived “order” outside their authority (CDPH + CDC state “optional”), and I raise the question of HUSD fraud. On Jan. 19, our school principal emailed all staff our monthly meeting notes from Curriculum Council. Among the notes: “Share with Departments. Was emailed to all parents and students. Wear masks inside and outside at all times.” I responded to all that requiring masks outdoors is outside CDPH and CDC guidance, so therefore the policy is in apparent error. The principal replied to all with choice to ignore the facts, and defame my response as both unprofessional and unworthy of serious reply: “Aren’t you supposed to be teaching right now”? This disrespect opened the door for other staff to attack: I responded to ad hominem replies and demands for my censorship over the next ten hours. The principal never addressed the policy question, nor the unprofessional ad hominem he began in a remarkable email chain from professional educators “dedicated to factual mastery.” I conclude this to be among the most powerful evidence against the district, and for asking obviously important questions if I seek justice in a courtroom. This also validates my ongoing observation that ~98% of people cannot rise above “official” propaganda even when facts are clearly and professionally documented. I received my relative “Socrates verdict” :)

 

I engaged with our Social Science Department teachers (5 of 9 opted out) regarding these policies apparently outside legal limits. I offered our two hero students instructions how to file an official district complaint. I started calling the HR Assistant Superintendent during class time on speakerphone to get answers to our questions, emailed those questions to the Health Director and her, and promised to call with my classes until we got answers (we got no answers to messages we left). 

 

On Jan. 22 I emailed leaderships of district, teachers’ union, and school admin (not boards) repeating documentation, questions, and promise to shine brighter light on the questions. Upon no response, on Jan. 23 I filed two more Grievances for apparently illegal policies on masks and student segregation, and promised to share the Grievances with teachers inviting their filing. I also promised to assist my 26 returning students from segregated “separate but equal” education to file complaints. On Jan. 23, the Superintendent promised a “response” the following day. On Jan. 24, I received notice from the HR Assistant Superintendent to not report to work on Jan. 25 (the first of 3 days of all-school final exams for the first semester, forcing me to cancel final exams for all my students) in order to be on a 9AM Zoom call that informed me I was placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” my January 17 email (Update 1). 

 

On Jan. 24 (Update 4) I received another notification from my principal that I was: “a potential close contact with a positive case in your class.  Students that are fully vaccinated can stay in school if they are not showing any symptoms. Please let us know if you have any questions, and take care.” I responded with questions how the district can order unvaxxed students home but not staff, and where in any authoritative document HUSD is empowered for their “in the same indoor space” “health” “order.” The principal did not respond, of course.

 

Paid administrative leave is censorship to remove my capacity to communicate with colleagues, and to stop my participation asking questions and citing apparent inconsistencies of HUSD “health” “orders” to limits of law. This censorship is because any answer HUSD has so far provided is further demonstration their “orders” are outside the law. HUSD will extend their “investigation” about how and why I asked questions (rather than answer obvious and essential questions) until the end of the school year, I predict.

 

On Monday Feb. 7, I Zoom-met my CTA/HEA-appointed attorney to discuss my case from a perspective to “play defense” against any likely district allegation. I framed the case as district evasion from questions that prove illegal “health” “orders” that anyone can verify by comparing “orders” to limits of definitive laws. I also requested a professional analysis of suing the district for per se defamation and any other related protections/remedies for my professional reputation, freedoms from ongoing harassment, and coercion into retirement to avoid further abuses.

 

On Feb. 9, 2022, the HR Assistant Superintendent managing my paid administrative leave claimed my 5 active Grievances against the district were “in abeyance” because “contractual issues to be resolved would fall within regular work duties.” She did not respond to my request to cite district authority to destroy due process with Grievances, despite my citations of all applicable contract language I could find and imagine that both gave no such authority, and reminded all of ongoing due process rights. Moreover, in reading that section of our CBA, I discovered HR has one contractual duty to me: an “updated progress report every five work days until resolution” that the district was ignoring. I responded sharply, including my union-appointed attorney, and union President + VP + CTA liaison. HR also continued silence to my repeated requests to schedule a Zoom meeting for the district’s answers to essential questions HUSD promised to answer; some questions going back to early October 2020.

 

On Feb. 17 after continued district silence, I offered the district’s HR Assistant Superintendent whistle-blower status by joining our side (she did not respond). On Feb. 21, I filed a 6th active employee Grievance for the district violating seven contractual rights regarding my being placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I’m asking questions (rather than answer them). My teachers’ union/CTA claimed that despite zero contractual language in support, my rights for Grievance due process are “in abeyance” “because” that “is the practice when folks are on leave.” I appealed to the CTA-appointed attorney, who promised a progress report on what the district is actually “investigating” about me, Grievances, and the possibility of a lawsuit against HUSD for their apparent harassment and defamation.

 

From Episode 48 on February 24 until March 10’s Episode 49, HUSD reported to me that they have nothing to report after at least 7 weeks of “investigation” (no surprise, as my union-appointed attorney and I are in agreement that the district can, and will, extend their “investigation” until the end of the school year to evade my questions and stop my reports to HHS staff). My attorney made a new and unique claim to district “legitimate” ordering authority on March 9 that Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations section 3205(c)(9)(E) allows employer discretion for “greater protections” and therefore allows an employer to create “health” “orders” outside any guidelines. I retorted in detail such a new “answer” after 18 months of asking HUSD + all 14 of the most authoritative CA government agencies is, on its face, bullshit after-the-fact desperation, and requested answers to pointed questions. On March 3, HEA’s President agreed to take my Grievances “out of abeyance” and join my request that the Superintendent and HR Assistant Superintendent answer all my questions! I accepted, and followed-up on March 10 to check status of this intriguing promise.

 

On March 25, 2022 I had a Zoom call with HUSD’s Superintendent, HR Assistant Superintendent, our teachers’ union President, and our local CTA representative to address 5 employee Grievances HUSD had ignored, then claimed are “in abeyance” after they forced me on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I asked questions. The superintendent claimed all district “health” “orders” are lawful because they grant “broader rights,” and that is the answer to all my questions. He refused to answer my follow-up “How is forcing me on unpaid leave for declining experimental medical products a ‘broader right’ to my Title 21 right to freely decline experimental medical products” because he claimed that is a question for the employee complaint process. The superintendent did promise to answer all questions through that process. After I read the procedures for complaints, my response back to the district is they’ve already violated that process with their choice to ignore my multiple requests for answers because they are required by law to meet with me to address my concerns. I again offered HUSD the opportunity to surrender by forcing these questions upon county and/or state rather than answer them, then to withdraw obedience if we receive no answers, or Orwellian doublespeak such as forced unpaid leave is a “broader right” for employees. The district is required to respond in writing as to their positions by Friday April 8, 2022, which includes another Grievance that I’m required by contract to not discuss until decided. I followed-up again to include another Assistant Superintendent managing the complaint process to request that the district acknowledge they’ve violated my rights, then meet with me to finally answer all my questions regarding “health” “orders” in apparent violations of multiple and superior laws.

 

On April 1, HUSD’s HR Assistant Superintendent sent me an email claiming to answer a question I verbally asked at our March 25th Zoom meeting, then claimed, “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information.  Please consider this the final response to this matter.” As you’ve predicted, this public school district allegedly committed to uphold the highest academic professional standards:

  • Invented a straw-man question I didn’t ask.
  • Ignored my submitted written questions, some going back to September, 2020 with repeated requests for answers ~20+ times.
  • “Answered” their own lie-created straw-man question, claimed they responded to my question, and asked me to shut-up: “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information.  Please consider this the final response to this matter.”

After my response to this lying Assistant Superintendent, I asked our teachers’ union president and CTA representative, “I'm curious: is HUSD usually this evil, unprofessional to repeatedly IGNORE written questions they are legally obligated to answer honestly, and soul-suckingly addicted to lying, OR is this unusual behavior for them?”

 

HUSD reneged on their timeline to respond to my four Grievances (I dropped one Grievance that HUSD began performing by reporting they had no updates to report upon), and responded late on April 18. By contract, I cannot report on those Grievances’ statuses until they are decided (amended on June 14, 2022 with HUSD’s decision to reject them all). I can report that the district claims my Complaints (distinct from Grievances) have all already been addressed because the Superintendent has repeatedly dictated to employees, students, and community that we must follow orders from the state. I used the superintendent’s reply to request the Assistant Superintendent managing due process of complaints, and the Complaint Manager, to join me in my questions receiving ethical answers beyond “just follow orders.” I sent these two further communication reminding that two students have been lied to since January 10 to receive an explanation with documentation how unvaxxed students could be segregated to “separate but equal” isolated “education” without evidence of their exposure to Covid through a “close contact” (within 6 feet for 15 minutes of a “positive” “test”).

 

Two days later, on Friday April 22, the superintendent emailed me to claim he is “the district.” This appears as an attempt to stop the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager from exercising our mutual Oath to support and defend limited government under Constitutional laws by comparing his non-answers to my actual questions (Update 1) for any violations of Complaint due process and laws. I responded that he speaks for his office only, and that the purpose of our Oath is for anyone and all of us to review “orders” for obvious violations of law. 

 

On April 25, I explicitly claimed whistleblower status to the Assistant Superintendent over Complaints and the Complaint Manager, and bcc’d the 11 parents and staff who had previously contacted me expressing support (Update 1, with one parent replying that she, too, had her Complaint ignored).  I followed with two more emails and three phone messages that these two minions all refused response, despite these follow-up emails quoting Board policy requiring HUSD to educate students and staff on health policies (not obfuscate and lie to students/staff by refusing to answer direct questions), and that HUSD continues to refuse to provide the information they received from the state for medical and religious exemptions to experimental medical products. On April 29 (Update 2), I emailed HUSD Board members with final legal notice that their employee superintendent and managed administrators refuse to honor due process of Complaints, and are covering-up apparent illegal “health” “orders.” At this point I no longer mask their identities, as they should be fully accountable to the public after 20 months of documented lies. I consider this an excellent essay to explain and document the core of HUSD’s two-part Orwellian “argument” to employees, students, and community: “Just follow orders,” and consequences for disobedience are “broader rights” granted by the district to those receiving the consequences. 

 

On May 5, 2022 my teachers’ union Board responded they are unlikely to support my Grievances to arbitration. I sent them the summary of indefensible district lies, crimes, and cover-ups, with questions of justice the union must accept (or be exposed as evil collaborators injecting children with poisonous “experiments”). We’ll meet via Zoom on May 17th. Our contract states that I’m to keep “all proceeding private,” but because I’m a whistleblower pointing out OBVIOUS crimes of proven deadly consequences who has been denied due process from the other parties in the contract, I must go to the public for any hope of justice. I assert legality from honoring the mutual Oath among HUSD, HEA, and me to support and defend limited government under our CA and US Constitutions. The USA and California are defined by our Constitutions, so without those limits coming first and foremost, our Oath has no meaning. Therefore, any conflict between our CBA and Oath must place our Constitutions superior to any CBA provision that would subvert them. Because I’ve abundantly demonstrated the prima facie-illegality of “health” “orders,” I am empowered by our Oath to take all reasonable actions to require official written explanations how such prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” are within the limits of law.

 

On May 22, I had yet to receive a decision from our teachers’ union Board, so I sent another email for clarifying choice that they must either stand for truth against OBVIOUS CTA and district lies, or bond with liars committing prima facie Crimes Against Humanity targeting children.

 

On May 26, HEA’s President emailed me to decline arbitration for all Grievances. This local teachers’ union, in communication with the state teachers’ union (CTA) therefore: 

  • Condone proven INVENTED “health” “orders” from districts that cannot be challenged, 
  • Allow school districts to ignore OBVIOUS questions from teachers, families, and students,
  • Support district proven lies to “order” student and teacher segregation (if unvaxxed) despite inventing the “orders” to do so,
  • Support school districts to refuse providing anyone with information about medical and religious exemptions to forced medical experiments on staff and children.

 

On June 14, 2022 I filed for retirement with request of settlement from HUSD for $500,000 as compensation for ending my career early, and for an openly hostile and harassing work environment. The email I sent to HUSD is an excellent summary of the two full school years of challenging my public school district’s prima facie-illegal “health” “orders” as an award-winning, and now retired, teacher.

 

**

 

Update 1:

 

Carl Herman retires: records + settlement requests

 

 

 

Carl Herman <>

 

Image removed.

Image removed.

to (HUSD Assistant Superintendent Watts, Superintendent Wayne, HEA President + VP + CTA Rep)  


Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:05 PM (7 minutes ago)

 

“For if Men are to be precluded from offering their Sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences, that can invite the consideration of Mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.”  ~ General George Washington, Address to the officers of the Army, March 15, 1783 (Newburg Address

 

“The Superintendent or designee shall collaborate with parents/guardians and local health agencies and organizations to develop a comprehensive approach to disease prevention that promotes preventative measures and education of students and staff. HUSD Board Policy 5141.22: Infectious Diseases (bold added)

 

“I, (insert your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.”  ~ As California public school employees, we all take this Oath before we are allowed onto a school site.

 

Assistant Superintendent Watts:

After 38 years working as a classroom teacher, I retire effective on Thursday June 16, 2022 after the last work day of the 2021-’22 school year. Please inform me how to retrieve my classroom belongings. Please provide to me and retain all records of HUSD’s “investigation” regarding my paid leave since January 2022.

 

For all the virtues you’ve contributed to students, colleagues, and community, I appreciate and salute you. For all the truth you’ve divulged in our communications, I thank you. To the degree you’ve knowingly and willfully contributed to prima facie-illegal “health” “orders,” I recommend you join us whistleblowers to reclaim your heart and honor.

 

I request a settlement from HUSD of $500,000 for creating such a hostile, defamatory, lie-filled, and prima facie-illegal work environment. I had planned to work another year before retiring, and would now rather settle with HUSD or sue for literal millions of dollars. The $500,000 settlement is fair because my projected lifetime earnings lost from a final teaching year (new contract with raise, another year and last “longevity bonus” of $100/month from CALSTRS, and with the higher salary as my final calculation for all retirement payments) is ~$9,000 less per year for my lifetime (~$250,000) and doubled for just compensation for my extra work over 21 months with added stress from HUSD’s constant harassing and hostile responses from my asking OBVIOUS and REQUIRED questions. If I do not receive HUSD’s response on this question by Friday June 24, I will assume HUSD’s declination for settlement.

 

Regarding HUSD’s choice of settlement or later consequences, this is why/how HUSD’s work environment is so hostile that no reasonable worker should return:

  • The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. HUSD has refused to address this documentation for two entire school years despite my 20+ requests, and is in prima facie-criminal conspiracy to support illegal dictatorial “health” “orders.” Illegal dictatorship is hostile by definition.
  • Superintendent Wayne emailed me on March 12, 2021 (Update 3): “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I did with the most authoritative 14 CA government agencies, and reported back 6 weeks later that all 14 refused to address how an “emergency” can be declared when “beyond control” hospitals never occurred in over a year beyond a few, and none known to be “beyond control” in the present (btw: it is fraud to lie in omission by never disclosing comprehensive hospital data). HUSD is hostile and prima facie-criminally complicit to subvert limited government under law for dictatorial government unlimited from “beyond control hospitals” authorization.
  • When I reported to HHS colleagues in a PLC (Professional Learning Committee) report the documentation of 14 CA government agencies’ responses, HUSD initiated the first of four formal disciplinary steps to terminate my employment, then refused to document anything I did in violation of any policy despite my multiple requests. This is hostile and harassing by definition. 
  • Only by my appeal to HEA did HUSD finally respond to my request to cite anything I did or wrote to warrant being threatened with employment termination. Assistant Superintendent of HR Watts emailed me on May 25, 2021 to claim the PLC report “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet failed again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests. To make such claims defaming my professionalism, and then refuse to provide evidence is hostile and harassing by definition.
  • The Grievances I filed after HUSD’s above defamation without proof were dictatorially declared by HUSD as “complaints” for the second time. HUSD then destroyed my Uniform Complaint due process rights by refusing to honor Steps 2 and 3 of the 4-step process, which would have been meetings where HUSD would be forced to answer questions. On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I only discovered HUSD’s intentional destruction of my right to receive reasonable answers to work policy questions in March, 2022 (Update 1) when I read the 4 Steps to discover HUSD had illegally refused Steps 2 and 3 again in Dec. 2021 and once more in March 2022 (Update 1). Superintendent Wayne refused any questions regarding these due process rights, claimed he investigated himself, and found he did nothing wrong. Nobody should work for such a ridiculously hostile entity.
  • On Monday September 20, 2021 Superintendent Wayne emailed my school’s Admin Team, teachers’ union president, and me to dictate the Professional Learning Committee I chair was censored because my addressing the previous school year’s doubled failure rate with “distance learning” (the most destructive decline of student learning in district history) “is not aligned with school or district goals and may not continue.” Consistent with history, the superintendent failed to cite anything I wrote to demonstrate his factual claims and refused to respond to my multiple requests. On December 14, and only with Grievance and HEA pressure, Wayne officially responded to two months of censorship under threat of employment termination if I continued reporting to teachers in “unprofessional conduct” claimed since April, 2021 but HUSD repeatedly refusing to cite anything I wrote, said, or did. Wayne withdrew the censorship under claim that the “initial” censorship was valid due to “district confusion” that my addressing a doubled student failure rate was not “focused on standards based instruction, and/or school goals, and/or district goals.” HUSD made this claim despite the PLC report in question stating in the first paragraph that the purpose of the report is to address our doubled student failure rate (btw: the reading level in the paragraph averaged at the 10th Grade level among 5 tests). HUSD claimed they needed “clarification,” and chose censorship rather than asking clarifying questions citing any concern. HUSD also chose silence over my two months of questioning to cite their concerns and alleged policy violations, including silence to two levels of my employee Grievance. My “clarification” was sufficient to remove district censorship, but not sufficient to remove district threat of my employment termination. The “H” in HUSD is supposed to stand for Hayward; not Hostile/Harassing.
  • On Wednesday September 22, 2021, HUSD’s school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (please see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs of deserved quotation marks, and a “top 10” list of more current data below). HUSD ignored the warnings of parents, staff, and me that forcing EUA (Emergency Use Authorized) medical products violates federal law Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requiring EUAs be administered only and always with “option to refuse” experimental medicine. Article 6 of the US Constitution is explicit that federal law is superior to state law/“mandates”/“orders”/“whatever.” California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 uphold Title 21 that every individual: “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.” HUSD “mandating” experimental injections or submit to weekly testing is hostile on its face given that everyone in the US under Title 21 is free to decline medical experiments without coercion or influence, and “hostile-boosted” with unpaid leave then being fired if I decline the equally experimental “tests.” 
  • On December 3, 2021 Assistant Superintendent Watts told HEA President Faraj and me “I don’t know” how HUSD can violate Title 21 by “ordering” experimental medical products (Update 2), then responded in writing that HUSD was honoring Title 21 because HUSD gave “broader rights” with their policies than Title 21 alone (Update 1). HUSD, of course, refused to explain (even with my declaring a formal employee complaint) how forced unpaid leave for me and forced segregation of students is anyone’s “broader rights” for exercising a Title 21-protected option. HUSD has refused to identify their anonymous “lawyer” giving such an Orwellian, hostile, and harassing “legal” “justification” so I could get an explanation from that person.
  • On November 15, 2021, Principal Seymour sent an “URGENT” email “ordering” ~200 students and their teachers to the quad: “All unvaccinated students will be sent home, all vaccinated student (sic) will return to class with a pass.” I discovered I was also “health ordered” home for 10 days, until I demanded documentation of definitions from the principal, and reminded him this ordering authority requires proof I was within 6 feet of a positive case for 15 minutes. After claiming no memory of the policy, the principal and I reviewed and proved “district error” (but 14 of my students were not provided this documentation for discovery of error, nor another teacher who was “ordered” home). Although my school principal admitted he lacked authority to “order” me into isolated segregation, he still obeyed district “orders” to segregate unvaxxed students. I immediately emailed Assistant Superintendent Watts requesting her to explain and cite district ordering authority to segregate healthy unvaxxed students, which she failed to provide despite 20+ requests. On December 3, 2021 Watts told HEA President Faraj and me that school segregation of unvaxxed students was “a choice” of the district because it “wasn’t practical” to observe the law (Update 2)! Watts promised us this was legal, and would provide all relevant documentation. Of course, Watts/HUSD has failed to do so for 7 months and counting in order to continue their hostile and harassing environment for employees and students.
  • HUSD has REFUSED since October 11, 2021 despite likely 30+ requests to provide me the government information they received to administer religious and medical exemptions to EUAs. Watts promised HEA President Faraj and me on our December 3, 2021 Zoom call to provide that information (Update 2), and Wayne with Watts promised Faraj and me again on our March 25th Zoom call (Update 1). Of course, HUSD reneged. Again, nobody should work under such lying hostility.
  • On December 17, 2021, HUSD issued a memo on students’ “vaccine deadline” stating that students “will not be excluded from school” if they don’t meet the testing requirement (Update 2). I immediately emailed Principal Seymour, our 4 Assistant Principals, and ~20 HHS staff members disclosed by Seymour who were “ordered” to “test” weekly asking if staff will also “not be excluded from school” if we don’t meet the “testing” “requirement.” I also asked if these “tests” HUSD administers were among those recalled from EUA on Dec. 31, 2021, and if this policy applies to all EAUs. Despite 3 emails that included Assistant Superintendent Watts (and HEA who refused to engage), we received no response to explain how such an apparent double-standard for HUSD to “play doctor” with our health is in conformance to law. This is a hostile and prima facie-illegal work environment that nobody should return to work in.
  • After the Winter Break on January 4, 2022, Principal Seymour reported another claimed “positive” “case” of “Covid,” and “health” “ordered” 18 of my students into “separate but equal” medical segregation for 10 days of “isolated-public education.” Two students asked for my help to stand for their rights that HUSD has zero evidence they had “close contact” within 6 feet for 15 minutes to the “positive” student, as the district claimed was the rule for unvaxxed students. My question to the principal how this is legal was responded with hostile harassment that my question was a “negative connotation” and refused to answer with promise of no further response (Update 1).
  • On Thursday Jan. 6, one of the two segregated students met with Assistant Principal Miller and then Principal Seymour before school, with me in attendance at her request. She asked them where their ordering authority is to segregate her without proof of “close contact.” Miller and Seymour both stated that they didn’t know. The student further met with AP Miller after I left to teach classes, with Miller calling Nurse Barron, who didn’t know. Miller then called Assistant Superintendent Davies, who didn’t know, but promised to meet with the students the following morning (Davies had all day to get an answer, but took no action). Davies met my two segregated students, who reported to me that Davies spent an hour trying to talk them out of their questions, claimed the district was acting “out of abundance of caution” (a talking point our principal also used), and finally promised to call the Alameda County Health Department to ask “what to do about these two students” after the two students refused to surrender their question. Despite having no evidence of ordering authority, she maintained the district’s “health” “order” for their isolated segregation with the prima facie-illegal claim of “separate but equal” public education. Davies reneged on her promise to respond no later than Monday Jan. 10 (Update 1), and ignored my three emails requesting she state who she spoke with at the county public health department, what documents were referenced, and what was discussed. The only response we received from Davies was after one of the students emailed Davies on Jan. 12 requesting a report. Her “answer:” “I do not have an update on how to prove the distance before quarantining.” Please note that this non-answer does not fulfill her promise to report on what she discovered by calling the county public health department, and is similar to a student missing a promised and due report on public policy, and when asked about it after two days being late, the student answers, “I do not have an update.” Davies never provided an “update.” HUSD expanded their in-your-face lies from HEA President Faraj and me to now include in-your-face lies to my students. Nobody should work under such hostile conditions of school leadership knowingly lying to the children they are there to serve. Worse, the purpose of HUSD’s lies is to target a minority group of students to “separate but equal” segregated public education.
  • Throughout these two full school years, Superintendent Wayne has claimed: “Specifically, the District is following governing protocols as referenced in our Board Policy 5141.22 and Education Code 32282 and 49403, which direct the District to cooperate with local health officer measures necessary for the prevention and control of communicable diseases in school age children specific to influenza pandemic episodes.” Of course, this documentation abundantly demonstrates Wayne and HUSD DO NOT COOPERATE with limits to “ordering authority,” but concoct their own unauthorized “health” “orders,” then either refuse to answer questions from teachers, parents, and students, or lie to our faces.
  • HUSD’s policy is to do what is explicitly forbidden by federal and state laws (see immediately below). HUSD claims this is legal because “occupy the field” for “broader rights” and “more stringent compliance” of “option to refuse EUAs” means state and/or local “health” “orders” to require EUAs in order to receive pay are both superior to Constitutional, federal, and/or state protected rights, and provide individuals “broader rights” and “more stringent compliance” than US Code Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) and California Health and Safety Code § 24171 to § 24176 on their own. HUSD’s written position in two paragraphs from an anonymous and un-cited source HUSD refuses to name is that State dictatorship under a claimed emergency destroys explicit state and federally-protected rights for as long as dictated. Article 6 of the US Constitution is inferior to state and/or local “emergency” dictatorship. Federal law is inferior to state and/or local “emergency” dictatorship. The above honors our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions of limited government. Without explanation from HUSD of their Orwellian claims, nobody should return to this work environment of lies, coercion, and harassment (Update 2 for more). 
  • I shared documentation of Assistant Superintendent Davie’s lies to HHS students to my HHS teaching colleagues so they could professionally consider the teaching and learning problem of their students being prima facie-illegally segregated out of our classrooms. My school principal responded publicly with ad hominem harassment (Update 4); stating my support of two segregated healthy students were “attacks,” “trying to indoctrinate students into his way of thinking,” and “is by far the lowest I have ever seen any "educator" sink in my 16 years in the profession.” Principal Seymour defamed my professional questions on school policies as “lengthy diatribes” “I refuse to respond (to),” then gave instructions to all my teacher colleagues how to block all emails from me on any subject. I find it difficult to imagine a more hostile response from a school principal to a teacher’s reasonable and cited questions on district policy.
  • The week of Jan. 10 to 14, 2022 was distance learning via computer because HUSD sent home too many healthy unvaxxed staff to keep the schools open. On Tuesday Jan. 18, HUSD emailed all staff and community members an “updated” policy to segregate unvaxxed students and staff if they were “in the same indoor space” as somebody “testing” “positive.” The phrase “in the same indoor space” does not exist in any CA, CDC, or county health information I could find, with HUSD REFUSING to state where it came from (who is giving HUSD their concocted “health” “orders”?). My response to district and union leaderships + boards included my promise for student and community complaints if I did not receive reasonable evidence authorizing their ordering authority for “in the same indoor space.” HUSD chose silence as their response. By Friday I had 26 of my healthy unvaxxed students “health” “ordered” to isolated segregation from this “same indoor space” invented phrase, but HUSD chose not to enforce this on staff (apparently motivated to keep school doors open). On Jan. 24 (Update 4) I received another notification from Principal Seymour that I was: “a potential close contact with a positive case in your class.  Students that are fully vaccinated can stay in school if they are not showing any symptoms. Please let us know if you have any questions, and take care.” I responded with questions how the district can order unvaxxed students home but not staff, and where in any authoritative document HUSD is empowered for their “in the same indoor space” “health” “order.” Seymour did not respond, of course. HUSD “plays doctor” to pick and choose which “health orders” to enforce or not, which proves a hostile political agenda (political=policy=“what is done”) to manipulate our school community, and certainly not a commitment to “health.”
  • On January 17, I reported to my broadest HUSD email audience that the district’s “requirement” for masks outdoors is also apparently a contrived “order” outside their authority (CDPH + CDC state “optional”). On Jan. 19, our school principal emailed all staff our monthly meeting notes from Curriculum Council. Among the notes: “Share with Departments. Was emailed to all parents and students. Wear masks inside and outside at all times.” I responded to all that requiring masks outdoors is outside CDPH and CDC guidance, so therefore the policy is in apparent error. Principal Seymour replied to all with choice to ignore the facts, and defame my response as both unprofessional and unworthy of serious reply: “Aren’t you supposed to be teaching right now”? This 2nd hostile response from the principal to me demonstrated by example that other staff can attack at will: I responded to ad hominem replies and demands for my censorship over the next ten hours. Principal Seymour never addressed the policy question, nor the hostile and harassing ad hominem he incited. 
  • On Jan. 22 I emailed leaderships of district, teachers’ union, and HHS Administrators repeating documentation, questions, and promised to shine brighter light. Upon no response, on Jan. 23 I filed two more Grievances for apparent illegal policies on masks and student segregation, and promised to share the Grievances with teachers to consider. I also promised to assist my 26 returning students from segregated “separate but equal” education to file complaints. On Jan. 23, Superintendent Wayne promised a “response” the following day. On Jan. 24, I received notice from HR Assistant Superintendent Watts to not report to work on Jan. 25 (the first of 3 days of all-school final exams for the first semester, forcing me to cancel final exams for all my students) in order to be on a Zoom call that informed me I was placed on paid administrative leave to “investigate” my January 17 email (Update 1). An independent jury will conclude from the specific email and totality of evidence that HUSD engaged in harassing and hostile behaviors that HUSD then attempted to cover-up by silencing me. I am abundantly justified to request a $500,000 settlement, or to seek civil justice in the millions. The students HUSD damned to a long-term substitute for the remainder of the school year is further evidence of HUSD’s hostility and harassment in a school environment.
  • On March 25, 2022 I had a Zoom call with Superintendent Wayne, HR Assistant Superintendent Watts, HEA President Faraj, and our local CTA representative Zev Kvitky to address 5 employee Grievances HUSD had ignored, then claimed are “in abeyance” after they forced me on paid administrative leave to “investigate” how and why I asked questions. Wayne claimed all district “health” “orders” are lawful because they grant “broader rights,” and that is the answer to all my questions. He refused to answer my follow-up “How is forcing me on unpaid leave for declining experimental medical products a ‘broader right’ to my Title 21 right to freely decline experimental medical products” because he claimed that is a question for the employee complaint process. Wayne promised to answer all questions through that process. After I read the procedures for complaints, my response documented that HUSD already violated that process with their choice to ignore my multiple requests for answers because they are required by law to meet with me to address my concerns. I again offered HUSD the opportunity to surrender by forcing these questions upon county and/or state rather than answer them, then to withdraw obedience if we receive no answers, or Orwellian doublespeak such as forced unpaid leave is a “broader right” for employees. On April 18, Wayne responded to the Grievances by again promising answers through the complaint process (never delivered), and that “there is no evidence that Mr. Seymour pressured Mr. Herman” from our contractual right to be “free from undue pressures of authority.” Of course, HUSD destroyed Steps 2 and 3 of the 4-step complaint process to renege on Wayne’s promise to explain how forced unpaid leave and involuntary student segregation are “broader rights” (Update 1). Wayne promised an “apology” for Principal Seymour’s “personal views,” and of course, never delivered. An independent audience will conclude HUSD condoned harassment and a hostile work environment in attempt to evade OBVIOUS questions that responsible teachers MUST ask, and persist asking to protect and defend students and adults subject to lies and prima facie-illegal segregation “orders.”
  • On April 1, HR Assistant Superintendent Watts sent me an email claiming to answer a question I verbally asked at our March 25th Zoom meeting, then claimed, “The District feels it has reasonably and sufficiently responded to this request for information.  Please consider this the final response to this matter.” This is more hostility and harassment because Watts invented a straw-man question I didn’t ask, ignored my submitted written questions (some going back to September, 2020 with repeated requests for answers ~20+ times), “answered” HUSD’s self-created straw-man question, claimed they responded to my question, and asked me to shut-up. More lies, more manipulation to silence me as a whistle-blower = more hostile and harassing work environment everyone should reject and bring to justice.
  • On April 25, I explicitly claimed whistleblower status to Assistant Superintendent Wu-Fernandez over Complaints, Complaint Manager Perez, and bcc’d the 11 parents and staff who had previously contacted me expressing support (Update 1, with one parent replying that she, too, had her Complaint ignored). I followed with two more emails and three phone messages that Wu-Fernandez and Perez refused response, despite these follow-up emails quoting Board policy requiring HUSD to educate students and staff on health policies (not obfuscate, lie to students/staff, and refuse to answer direct questions), and that HUSD continues to refuse to provide the information they received from the state for medical and religious exemptions to experimental medical products. On April 29, 2022 (Update 2), I emailed HUSD Board members with final legal notice that their employee superintendent and managed administrators refuse to honor due process of Complaints, and are covering-up apparent illegal “health” “orders.” Nobody responded. Destroying my due process rights to complain in order to further harass a whistleblower was accepted at all levels of HUSD leadership.
  • HUSD, Superintendent Wayne, Assistant Superintendent Watts, Assistant Superintendent Davies, Associate Superintendent Wu-Fernandez, Complaint Manager Perez, Principal Seymour, and HUSD Board all violate Board Policy 5141.22 (see above at the start of this communication) that Wayne repeatedly cites by refusing to educate students and staff on HUSD’s “health orders” by doing the opposite: refusing to answer direct, obvious, and required questions, OR stating they don’t know and promising to find out then never responding, OR Wayne’s pathetic straw-man lie that would fail a middle school reading comprehension test that my questions “all are variations of the initial question you asked in October, 2020: How does HUSD have the authority to implement policies in response to COVID-19?” Wayne concludes with the gaslighting lie, “While you may insist on further explanation, the district has met its obligation to provide a response.” These Orwellian HUSD lies obviously create a hostile work environment of constant harassment to obey Big Brother.
  • For 21 months HUSD has REFUSED to address our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions within their limited governing authorities despite my ~20 requests. The purpose of this Oath is for Americans to “support and defend” literal Truth, Justice, and the American way of limited government under constitutionally-protected inalienable/Natural rights. The above points have abundantly proven that HUSD has knowingly and willfully chosen hostility to our Oath, and harassment to those honoring it.
  • For 21 months HUSD has failed to perform what we expect from all CA and HUSD middle school students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81). HUSD has refused to address their hostile hypocrisy. Imagine being a teacher at a district working with the harassment of “leadership” issuing “orders” below the cognitive level of middle schoolers.
  • HUSD harassed, defamed, and intentionally silenced a teacher who correctly pointed to the law to prove HUSD policies of forced experimental medical products on employees and the children in our care is OBVIOUSLY illegal. HUSD “justified” their refusal with OBVIOUS LIES that destroy Title 21 protection to be free from coerced injections of God knows how many “medical” experiments, and to LIE that Title 21 can “justify” forced unpaid leave for teachers and forced medical segregation for students who decline to be shot 1, 2, 3, 4 + times with a brew causing the below data. HUSD refused to explain this “reasoning” when asked by the teacher, who obviously deserved an explanation to such ridiculous and Orwellian doublespeak. HUSD refused to stand with the teacher to at least question the county and state “legal experts” to get an explanation. In the end, HUSD refused to defend employees, and HEA refused to defend the children. HUSD stood with forced-medical segregationists, and their Ministry of Truth paper-thin propaganda that forced unpaid leave is an employee’s “broader right” of free choice. HUSD “just followed orders” despite my repeated admonitions that all CA and HUSD students learn from WW2 history that “just follow orders” is an illegal defense of authority. Top 10 current data followed by just two graphs:
    1. CDC reports that the most-vaccinated US counties have the highest rates of testing positive for Covid. In 500 counties where 62 to 95 percent of the population is vaccinated, these counties average ~75 new “cases” per 100,000 residents. In 500 counties where 11 to 40 percent of the population got vaxxed, they averaged ~58 cases per 100,000 residents. UK official data report the triple vaccinated are up to 5 times more likely to test positive, with vaccine effectiveness quantified at minus 391%. Walgreens reports data from over 5,000 of their pharmacies that the unvaxxed have the lowest positive test rate, with more vaccinations producing higher positive tests, and the highest rates from triple-vaxxed after 5 months (74% higher than unvaxxed).
    2. CDC reports ~27,000 US deaths from Covid vaccines, over 200,000 serious injuries, and over one million total “adverse events.” Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
    3. Professional Athletes suffered ~900 cardiac arrests with 579 deaths and counting after Covid-19 vaccination in the past year (FIFA player deaths increased by 300%).
    4. The UK government’s Office for National Statistics now report that children aged 10-14 who are vaccinated have a risk of death over 51 times than the unvaccinated (see table at top of this email).                                                                            
    5. After Pfizer lost their lawsuit attempting to hide Covid vaccine study data for 75 years, Pfizer’s exposed fertility data showed that 82% to 97% of vaccinated women in pregnancy lost their unborn babies (and here). Pfizer’s documentation concludes the criminal lie: “No safety signals emerged.” Pfizer claimed their vaccine was safe for pregnancies based on their studies of 44 disected pregnant rats in France instead of their humans, with the study choosing to not observe the development of the baby rats (Dr. Naomi Wolf walks through much data in 9 minutes).
    6. Pfizer’s human trials produced 1,223 deaths within 28 days of vaccination (~3% death rate). 
    7. CDC reports ~70% of Americans now refuse any more vaccines; likely based on emerging awareness of this data. 
    8. A just-published peer-reviewed study from 35 countries and 600+ million people demonstrate that wearing face masks provided no significant protection, and was correlate with higher death rates (study and analysis). 
    9. You haven’t heard of most of this data because 6 corporate media monsters control ~90% of what you receive for “news.” I have one published academic paper: professors at the Claremont Colleges asked me to document how corporate media sold lies known to be false as they were told to pimp the ongoing wars formerly known as “on terror.” I already documented for HHS teachers sufficient similar data to withdraw consent in September 2021, yet they, like you, will not easily question their own government. Dr. King found the same.
    10. You all know this comes down to HUSD lying to all of us for money, right? 21 minutes from a policy analyst working with 28 colleagues to understand how school districts and hospitals are getting paid to require masks, segregation, and vaccination, no matter how illegal and immoral. HUSD has sold out the rights we all teach and have an Oath to defend by taking government monopoly money. In the end, all will see this.

  

Image removed.

Image removed.

  • For 21 months HUSD has failed to address other teaching standards that I model in good-faith professionalism, and that HUSD rejects with hostility and harassment of the role model. HUSD virtue-signals their “care” for students while REFUSING to model what we expect all CA and HUSD students to know and demonstrate through their actions. And again, HUSD forced me on administrative leave the day before final exams in the 1st Semester, then damned my students to a substitute teacher for the rest of the 2021-2022 school year in hostile disregard for excellence in teaching and learning. HUSD’s hostile hypocrisy includes CA state teaching standards, HUSD Core Values, and HHS Farmer expectations for all students. Imagine being a teacher in such a “professional” environment of anti-scholarship and reckless disregard for the most basic safety laws protecting children from dangerous experimental injections:

 

[CA public school students] will learn that all citizens deserve equal treatment under the law, safeguarded from arbitrary or discriminatory treatment by the government. …Students will examine both the constitutional basis for and current examples of the fact that members of the government are themselves subject to the law… Students learn that democracies depend on an actively engaged citizenry—individuals who fully participate in the responsibilities of citizenship (such as voting, serving in the military, or regular public service)— for their long-term survival. … Students may also define and identify illegitimate power and explore how dictators have gained and held onto office. The fundamental components that typically distinguish democracies from dictatorships include control of the media, lack of political and personal freedoms, corruption of public officials, lack of governmental transparency, and the lack of citizens’ access to changing the government. Case studies should be included in this unit in order to consider the economic, social, and political conditions that often give rise to tyranny. Does such a government rest on the consent of the governed? Do citizens have rights that the state must respect; if so, what are they? What is the role of civil dissent, and when is it necessary?”  ~ California History-Social Science Framework, Chapter 17: Principles of American Democracy (pages 434, 435, 437, 451, with bold added)

 

“Students need to know their rights and responsibilities as American citizens and have both the capacity and willingness to participate in a democratic system of government. Educators want students to understand the meaning of the Constitution as a social contract that defines a democratic government and guarantees individual rights. Educators want them to respect the right of others to have different beliefs and ideas. Students need to take an active role as citizens and know how to work for change in a democratic society. The value, the importance, and the fragility of democratic institutions must be understood by all students. Only a small fraction of the world’s population now or in the past has been fortunate enough to live under a democratic form of government, and students need to understand the conditions that encourage democracy to prosper.”  ~ California History-Social Science Frameworkpages 14-15 (bold added)

 

“These democratic values should be taught in the classroom, in the curriculum, and in daily life outside school. Teachers are encouraged to have students use the community to gather information regarding public issues and become familiar with individuals and organizations involved in public affairs. … Whenever possible, opportunities should be available for participation and for reflection on the responsibilities of citizens in a free society.

 

…Educators want students to perceive the complexity of social, economic, and political problems. They want them to be able to both comprehend and evaluate an argument and develop their own interpretations supported by relevant evidence. Educators want them to have the ability to differentiate between what is important and what is not. Students need to know their rights and responsibilities as American citizens and have both the capacity and willingness to participate in a democratic system of government. Educators want students to understand the meaning of the Constitution as a social contract that defines a democratic government and guarantees individual rights. Educators want them to respect the right of others to have different beliefs and ideas. Students need to take an active role as citizens and know how to work for change in a democratic society. The value, the importance, and the fragility of democratic institutions must be understood by all students. Only a small fraction of the world’s population now or in the past has been fortunate enough to live under a democratic form of government, and students need to understand the conditions that encourage democracy to prosper. By developing a keen sense of ethics and citizenship, students develop respect for all persons as equals regardless of ethnicity, nationality, gender identity, sexual orientation, and beliefs. Educators want students to care deeply about the quality of life in their community, the nation, and their world. The desire of educators is to have students recognize their responsibility as members of the global community to participate ethically and with humanity in their interactions with various nations, cultures, and peoples.”  ~ (pages 14-15California History-Social Science Framework)

 

HUSD CORE VALUES

Collaborative Leadership: We develop leaders at all levels who creatively tackle our challenges and communicate with integrity and transparency.

Data-Informed Decisions: We use multiple types of data, including stakeholder voice, to inform decisions and monitor progress.

Well-Supported Staff: We enhance the capacity of every employee to promote equity and model service excellence.

 

FARMERS: 

 

Focused learners

Analytical thinkers 

Responsible and respectful citizens

Mindful collaborators

Effective communicators  

Resourceful users of technology 

Self-advocating individuals

 

**

Only the truth can set you free. You can free yourself, or be subject to public discovery in an Emperor’s New Clothes moment that will come for all.

 

Carl

 

 

**

 

Up next!

 

I will pursue HUSD’s settlement for $500,000 or pursue a civil case in the millions. 

 

Stay tuned for our next episode :)