Okay, I just have to diary about this, although in many ways this falls into the "none of our business category".
But it appears that Pallin's last child, a baby with Down's syndrome, may not be hers. It may be that of her teenage daughter.
Here's a link just to get you started:
Now, normally my policy is hands off the kids. And I sincerely wish Bristol the best in coping with a disadvantaged child.
But the bottom line is that Sarah Palin's judgement is called into question if she indeed pretended to be the mother of the child. Is Sarah protecting Bristol?
Where is the father? Why is he not being held to his responsibilities as a father? Is Sarah protecting the father, and if so, why?
If this woman is to be one heartbeat away from having the keys to the nuclear missiles, how she handles her family is key to predicting how she will handle the nation.