PROPAGANDA ALERT Fire, Not Explosives, Felled 3rd Tower on 9/11, Report Says

Using videos, photographs and building design documents, the investigators at the National Institute spent the last three years building an elaborate computer model of 7 World Trade Center that they used to test various chains of events to figure out what caused the collapse, Dr. Sunder said.

...

Dr. Sunder said the investigators chose not to use the computer model to evaluate whether a thermite-fueled fire might have brought down the tower, since 100 pounds of it would have had to have been stacked directly against the critical column that gave way, which he said they did not believe had occurred.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

So, early in the article they brag about this wonderful computer model they developed to determine what happened to World Trade Tower 7, then chosenot to use it to test the thermite theory. We know why. The model, if indeed accurate, would have confirmed that the only way for World Trade Tower 7 to collapse straight down into its own footprint was for every single load bearing column, over 70, to fail at the exact same moment.

Note also the diss at the end that those who refuse to accept the official story must have psychological problems.

We refuse to accept the official story because it is a huge steaming pile of bovine excrement.

My letter to the New York Times

So let me see if I have this correct. The investigators ( I use that term loosely here) brag about this very complete computer model of World Trade Tower 7 early in the story, then deeper in we learn that the investigators choose NOT to use it?

That is why the public no longer trusts the official explanation of anything, or the corporate media that continues to promote it.

Comments

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA