The Amazing Debate - Prezbyter & James Randi on 9-11
I'm a little troubled by the number of 'skeptics' who are skeptical of everything except what is promoted as the conventional wisdom. A simple test for me is does the person or group making a claim have a history of dishonesty. Are they liars?
The Bush/Cheney administration claimed that Iraq was involved in the crimes of 9/11. Repeatedly. This has been proven to be a lie, among many other lies by those guys. Lies that profited them and their associates. They referred to 9/11 as an 'opportunity'. It was a crime most egregious. If they lied about the involvement of one nation/collective, then how I wonder does a skeptic believe what they said about the involvement of another nation/collective?
By eschewing real skepticism.
The belief in lies is the encouragement of liars.
Do they really need more?
Specify. I'm not good at guessing what you're trying to say.