The BBC cannot resist attacking anyone who questions the establishment line and counters mainstream accounts of events, especially if they make up part of the new and exciting alternative media that is contributing to the corporation’s ongoing fossilization.
That is why in a feature article today, the corporation is promoting a group of “scientists and skeptics” whose declared mission is to vigorously debunk those who are questioning the “accepted versions” of events.
Okay, can you debunk the fact that the BBC reported the collapse of WTC-7 BEFORE IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED?
Here is my email to James "The Amazing" Randi
Aloha from fellow member of the Castle
I am sure you will not remember me, but you and I used to chat from time to time at the Magic Castle back in the 1980s when I still worked as a professional magician.
I am somewhat puzzled by your willingness to participate in the BBC's attempt to discredit those who ask questions regarding the official story of 9-11, since it is the BBC itself which created one of the greatest puzzles of all; how were they able to report on the collapse of WTC-7 almost a half hour before it actually happened.
Given that no steel-framed building had ever collapsed from fire in the entire history of skyscrapers, there was no way to "guess" ahead of time that this would happen.
Feel free to send along your own comments to Randi.