9/11 Facts That Need To Be Addressed
The Secret Service at Booker Elementary: The Dog That Did
The Sarasota Herald Tribune announced Bush's visit to Booker Elementary on September 8th, giving the 9-11 planners three days to include Bush as a target for a diving jetliner. Nobody could have safely assumed he was not a target. The Booker Elementary video shows the Secret Service did not rush in to remove the President to a secure location, or at least to the safety of the armored Presidential Limousine. That's their job. That's what they do in the case of a real surprise attack with many unknowns. They don't do anything else.
But the Secret Service did nothing.
If the events of 9-11 were truly a surprise to the United States Government then there is no way the Secret Service could have known there wasn't a hijacked or stolen plane heading towards Booker Elementary School that very second.
Radio Transmissions of WTC 2 Firefighters
Firefighters reported only isolated pockets of fire on the 77th floor immediately before the collapse, so where was the all-consuming inferno?
New York's Office of Emergency Management Issued a WTC Collapse Warning
How did the OEM know something that firefighters in WTC 2's impact area didn't?
World Trade Center 2: There Was No Inferno
Stanley Praimnath's office on the 81st floor of WTC 2 was a bullseye hit for Flight 175. Mr Praimnath survived and was rescued by Brian Clark who came down from the 84th floor. Their survival proves there was no inferno in WTC 2. Both have given interviews to the BBC, e.g. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14766882. None of their interviews mention a raging inferno.
World Trade Center 1: There Was No Inferno
At 9:05 am Patricia Alonso was on the 95th floor of WTC 1 speaking to her husband on a mobile phone. If fires brought down WTC 1 then this area of the building should have been an unsurvivable fiery hell - the core of the building would have required a phenomenal amount of heat to fail as it did.
Woman Waving From WTC 1 Impact Area
More evidence there was no inferno at the core of WTC 1.
The "Truss Theory": A Fantasy Concocted to Conceal a Demolition
NIST has had two attempts at explaining the the WTC collapses with a "truss theory". Both explanations are fatally flawed because they say the twin towers were held together with little more than 5/8" bolts.
WTC 2: Cutter Charges and Cover-Up
Many firefighters' oral histories describe the sound of cutter charges detonating as WTC 2 collapsed. This is verified by a video. The original video soundtrack has been changed to eliminate these sounds.
Shaped Charges and the World Trade Center Collapses
Why were high velocity explosives detonating in the vicinity of the World Trade Center?
Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the 9/11 Demolition
Fox News: "Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall."
9/11/2001 radio broadcast: "...I was just standing there, ya know... we were watching the building [WTC 7] actually 'cuz it was on fire... the bottom floors of the building were on fire and... we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder... turned around - we were shocked to see that the building was... well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out... it was horrifying... about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that."
Video Evidence of an Explosion at the Base of WTC 1
A video shows two perspectives of WTC 1's collapse. The inset video shows the camera shake at roughly six seconds. Five seconds later the main video shows dense white smoke appearing at the building's base. Seconds later the building collapses.
The Ground Zero Fires Were Not Conventional Fires
The smoke rising from the wreckage of the WTC for months after the collapses contained no soot, it was a dense white. All videos of the WTC wreckage show this white smoke. This points to the fires being caused by a chemical reaction, that reaction being thermite.
How Did the WTC Fires Burn for Months?
It took millions of gallons of water over a period of five months to extinguish the fires in the WTC wreckage. Neither jet fuel nor burning office equipment can account for this. Thermite can.
Thermite and the WTC Collapses
A thermite reaction generates large amounts of ultraviolet radiation.
On 27 September, the officials ordered 2000 gallons of [Pyrocool FEF], which when added to water produces a slippery, low-viscosity foam. ... Berger adds that "Pyrocool also contains two powerful ultra-violet absorbers."
9/11 WTC Explosions: The Official Collapse Theory Implodes
Numerous videos documenting events as they happened at the WTC on 9/11. Many reports of bombs and explosions.
"...there are all kinds of reasons we thought [the 9/11 Commission was] set up to fail. We got started late. We had a very short time frame, indeed we had to get it extended. We did not have enough money. They were afraid we were gonna hang somebody, that we would point the finger."
9/11 Commission Testimony: There was a young man who came in and said
to the vice president "The plane [Flight 77] is 50 miles out" [from
Washington], "The plane is 30 miles out", and when it got down to "The
plane is 10 miles out" the young man also said to the vice president "Do
the orders still stand?", and the vice president turned and whipped his
neck around and said "Of course the orders still stand, have you heard
anything to the contrary?"
What Really Happened