In order to believe the suicide theory to be valid, one must accept that Vincent Foster placed a .38 revolver into his own mouth and pulled the trigger without getting any of his fingerprints or his blood on the gun or powder or bullet fragments from the gun into the wound.
A short list of FACTS from the OFFICIAL RECORDS.
No blood on the gun. FBI lab report dated May 9th 1994, page 10.
No fingerprints belonging to Vincent Foster on the gun. FBI Memo attached to lab report dated May 9th 1994, page 2.
No powder matchable to the dark blued steel gun found in the wounds. FBI lab report dated May 9th 1994, page 8.
No bullet fragments in the wounds. Beyer Autopsy, Gross Description page, next to last paragraph.
I repeat: The claim of suicide requires Vincent Foster to have inserted a .38 revolver into his own mouth and pulled the trigger without getting hi fingerprints or blood on that gun or powder or bullet fragments from that gun in his wounds.
Dr. Beyer's autopsy, on which every claim of suicide has been based, has been utterly destroyed by the discovery of the official report of Dr. Haut, the M.E. that examined Vincent Foster at Fort Marcy Park. This report was uncovered at the National Archives during a document search by Hugh Sprunt, Hughie2U, and Patrick Knowlton. While part of the official records of the Foster case, Dr. Haut's report was notably absent from the report published by the Senate Banking Committee.
Dr. Haut reconfirmed the report to Reed Irvine of "Accuracy In Media" and in that report, confirms the presence of a gunshot wound exiting Vincent Foster's neck. This corroborates the sworn deposition of EMS technician Richard Arthur who described a gunshot wound along Foster's jawline under the right ear.
Dr. Beyer did not include that wound in his autopsy report. Indeed, that wound was obliterated by the drastic measure of removing Foster's entire tongue and soft pallet prior to allowing investigators to view the remains, under the excuse that the removal was needed to properly inspect the entrance wound.
Beyer's past history isn't the most reassuring. Indeed he seems to be the Virginia version of the infamous Dr. Fahmy Malek, the Arkansas M.E. who ignored clear evidence of homicide in the deaths of Don Henry and Kevin Ives and in one case ruled that a man who had been beheaded was dead of natural causes.
Beyer himself, in the case of Tommy Burkett, ignored a broken jaw in order to rule that Burkett had killed himself with a gun. Despite having shown the autopsy photos to Burkett's father, Beyer later claimed (as he did with the Foster X-rays) that they had never really existed.
Likewise, in 1989 there was an autopsy on establishing the death of a man named Tim Easley. Mr. Beyer, the coroner, ruled that Easley killed himself by stabbing himself in the chest. He failed to notice a defensive wound on the man's hand. The case was reopened, and, after an outside expert reviewed the case, Easley's girlfriend confessed to murdering him.
In short, Dr. Beyer's consistent performance (indeed his "specialty") appears to be the cover up of murder by declaration of suicide!
Beyer testified before the Senate Banking Committee Whitewater Hearings on July 29, 1994, specifically stating that there an "absence of trauma to the jaw." It should be noted that Beyer has therefore committed perjury before the United States Senate.
Scans of Dr. Haut's actual report are available for viewing and download at HTTP://www.whatreallyhappened.com/~rivero/POLITICS/FOSTER_COVERUP/NECK/neck.html
Scans of Dr. Beyer's flawed autopsy are available for viewing and download at HTTP://www.whatreallyhappened.com/~rivero/POLITICS/FOSTER_COVERUP/AUTOPSY/autopsy.html
Then there is the matter of the silver gun.
Vincent Foster was found with a .38 Revolver made by Colt Arms. It was built from parts taken from two other guns, and as a result had two serial numbers. The Frame number was 355055, and according to the records of the Colt Arms company (scanned and available at my website) the gun was manufactured with a standard dark blue, almost black, finish.
In the Park Police record, the gun is describes as black. The accompanying photographs in the Park police report show a black gun. (Also scanned and available at my website.)
The photograph leaked by the White House to ABC-TV also shows a dark gun. Outside of a glint from the camera flashgun, the gun image is too dark to even detect the manufacturers blue color. One thing is quite clear, and that is that the sharp protruding edges of the gun, where the finish would wear off preferentially, show no signs of wear. Compare the albedo of the gun to Fosters gold ring on his finger, just an inch away.
In all the Fort Marcy Park witnesses, in the Park Police, in the experts at the FBI and ballistics lab, the gun is never described as anything but dark blue or (more often) black.
No connection exists between that gun and Vincent Foster. Not even fingerprints. Not even blood. Even the DNA traces on the gun, while "not inconsistent" with Foster, were more likely to have originated with a black or an Hispanic than a Caucasian.
Despite this, Robert Fiske (the ex-BCCI lawyer) inserted a comment on page 38 of his report on Foster; a statement that Lisa Foster thought the gun found with her husband was one she had brought up from Little Rock, Arkansas.
This statement came from an interview of Lisa Foster conducted by the FBI several months after the murder of Vincent Foster, under the watchful eyes of attorney Jim Hamilton and Fiske's representative on the scene, Roderick Lankler.
In the original FD-302a report of the interview, as well as the handwritten notes (scanned and available at my website), the interviewing FBI agents describe the gun being shown to Lisa Foster as "silver colored", not just once, but several times. The gun is never described as dark blue or black. The FBI agents are not quoting Lisa Foster, they write down THEIR impressions of what is being said and done, and in their own words,"LISA FOSTER believes that the gun found at Fort Marcy Park may be the silver gun which she brought up with her other belongings when she permanently moved to Washington."
In order for Lisa Foster to believe that the gun presented to her as the Fort Marcy Park gun might be the family silver gun, the gun presented to her as the Fort Marcy Park gun must also be silver. Lisa Foster doesn't have to be a gun expert to know that silver is not black.
From both the FD-302a form (released as part of the first Senate Whitewater hearings) and the handwritten notes (pried loose via Chris Ruddy's FOIA lawsuit), it's clear that Lisa Foster was shown a gun she recognized as the gun she brought up from Little Rock, but it's equally clear that this is not the same gun as that found with Vincent Foster. Black is not silver.
Once found out, this lie generated more lies to try to keep the cover up in place, including the ludicrous suggestions that Lisa Foster cannot tell silver from black, and that two FBI agents, and two lawyers heard and saw a black gun described as silver in writing and did not request a clarification or (as would be standard procedure) note the gun's serial number to preserve the chain of evidence.
One thing is clear, regardless of just exactly how the FBI's report came to describe a silver gun, it is utterly worthless in connection to the dark blued steel .38 found with Vincent Foster, yet that is precisely how Fiske chose to use it, paraphrasing (minus gun color, of course) Lisa's statement into his report to link the .38 revolver to Vincent Foster.
The Fiske Report, having based it's conclusion that Vincent Foster owned the dark blued steel revolver he was found with solely on Lisa Foster's recognition of a silver gun, is invalidated.
The FBI, already in court for evidence tampering in another area of the Vincent Foster affair, manufactured the testimony of Lisa Foster as it was used in the Fiske Report.
This pattern of repeated alterations in evidence and testimony proves the existence of a cover up, which in turn proves murder.
