In article <334C32AF.1AF3@GLOBALDIALOG.COM>,
John Q. Public wrote:
>not to be used for commercial purposes
>
>Lawyer accused of giving laundered drug
> cash to DNC, Clinton inaugural
> April 9, 1997
> 8.01 p.m. EDT (0001 GMT)
>
> LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- An Arkansas lawyer was
> charged Wednesday with laundering $380,000 in drug
> money and funneling some of it to the Democratic
> National Committee in 1992 and President Clinton's
> 1993 inauguration.
>
This is the SECOND time that drug tainted money has been confirmed
to have funded Bill Clinton's political career.
At my website are two photos of cocaine smuggler Jorge Cabrera at the
White House with Hillary and at a Florida fund raiser with Al Gore.
Everyone all happy and smiling (except Al, but don't read too much into
that).
Despite earnest efforts to point the finger of blame to China for the
cash that had to be laundered through such places as a California Buddhist
temple, both Cabrera and the above lawyer establish a clear pattern
of domestic drug cash flowing into Bill Clinton's campaign coffers.
This is a serious matter, and as was voiced in a somewhat different
context, the mere appearance of impropriety demands a full investigation.
The place to start an investigation would be the 1992 fund raisers.
Prior to becoming Commerce Secretary, Ron Brown was a major DNC
fund raiser. Alas, we cannot ask him about campaign irregularities,
as Brown, on the eve of being indicted, died in a plane crash. The claim
that the crash as the result of bad weather, in addition to having been
proven a lie, fails to account for why the aircraft lost all of it's cockpit
radios and radar transponders while still 7 miles from the crash site and
1/2 mile above the Adriatic.
So, let's ask C. Victor Raiser II, the co-chairman of Clinton's 1992
presidential campaign finance committee.
Except we can't. He and his son died in a small plane crash in clear
weather.
Not to worry, there's always Herschel Friday, a member of Clinton's 1992
presidential campaign finance committee.
Except that he too is dead in a plane crash.
Okay, no problem, we can ask Ed Willey, the manager of the Clinton 1992
campaign finance committee. He had a reputation for being seen with large
quantities of campaign cash and fortunately for us, avoided airplanes.
Except that he's dead of a gunshot, declared a suicide without any evidence.
Perhaps the investigation should look into Clinton's personal finances,
via the mandatory blind trust, which was not only six months late, but
according to Carolyn Huber's testimony to the Whitewater committee was
incomplete. To find out what assets have been left out of the trust,
we could ask the preparer.........
Vincent Foster.
Drug money funding the campaign. The fund raisers who handled the campaign
the Clinton personal finances all dead under suspicious circumstances.
Even without the furor that surrounds the allegations of cocaine smuggling
in Mena, Arkansas and the money laundering through ADFA and the cluster of
banks associated with "Whitewater", there is an appearance of impropriety.
An investigation is warranted. It must be demanded. Here's why.
Recent Presidents of both Columbia and Mexico have been linked to drug
running. It doesn't take a great deal of intelligence to understand that
someone who rises to power on the proceeds of selling drugs to their own
population are not inherently concerned with the well being of that
population. One only has to look at the recent sharp decline in the
quality of life in those nations to see that this is true.
Despite the flood of evasions and excuses put out by the White House
staff, the owned media, and every drug addict with a computer, the fact
is inescapable. Bill Clinton's campaign has been partially funded with
drug money.
This is a serious matter. It is the crime for which the President of
Columbia was arrested and tried. Although acquitted, he is not exhonorated.
And the reality of the drug trade here in the United States since Bill
Clinton came to power? It has doubled! Staffs at Federal anti-drug enforcement
has been slashed, "feel good" but totally ineffective programs like D.A.R.E.
are held aloft to prove that the government is at least trying to deal with
the problem, but the end result is that drug use, cocaine use, among our
young people has doubled since Clinton took office.
When I still lived back in Los Angeles, there was a "Strawberry" living
on the block. In street-talk, a strawberry is a woman so hooked on cocaine
that she will barter any sexual act for whatever amount of money she needs
for that next dosage, even if all she needed to make the buy was another
five dollars.
Homeless and pregnant when we moved away, only a few years have
passed since she was somebody's little daughter.
So how did this little girl, and the millions just like her, become such
hopeless addicts?
Because we live in a society that is set up in such a way as to make the sales
of these drugs a far more profitable enterprise than more benign pursuits.
In creating a system of drug laws that make crime pay we will inevitably
have more crime. It's that simple.
This little girl didn't start out looking to become an addict. Nobody ever
does. A dealer gave her a "free sample"; a "loss leader", and nurtured
along her addiction, as any salesman will develop an ongoing relationship
with their customers.
Why did the dealer do this? Because there's money to be made. Because by
going out and seeking children to feed drugs to pays big bucks.
And when those dealers donate part of those big bucks to political
candidates, those candidates will change the laws to benefit their
"constituency". So that business can improve.
This is a wake up call to parents everywhere. It's denial to imagine that
your children are somehow immune to the lure of the drug dealers just because
they are the cutest children on planet Earth. Someone's child has to become
the one addict today. In another few years, it will be 2 children, then 4.
That's a depressing trend for any adult who cares about their children.
The risk is real, the effects devastating, and according to a recent study,
the benefits of such programs as D.A.R.E. are non-existence.
I don't have kids. My first wife obtained an abortion without telling
me and that's the closet I ever got. In hindsight, it was for the best,
as Broadzilla herself was caught up in the drug scene as well. But even
though I personally have not been blessed with children, the idea that our
President funded his campaign on the proceeds of drug sales to everyone's
children fills me with anger.
If you love your children, take a good look at what's been happening in
Mexico and Columbia. Take a drive to the "bad" part of your town and take
a good look at the faces of the men and women who are trapped in the
endless hopeless hell called drug addiction, stealing, or selling themselves
for that next hit.
Because while Bill Clinton has been in office, won in a campaign now known
to be tainted with drug money, the chances that your son or daughter will wind
up like those people has doubled.
Is this really the government you wish to leave to your children?
Is this really the government you wish to leave your children to?
